I’ve been struggling with this for a while now. My team has developers, but we also have people who understand our business logic inside and out but can’t write JavaScript. We needed a way to let both groups contribute to automations without creating bottlenecks.
I started exploring no-code builders, and honestly, I was skeptical. Every time I hit a limitation before, it was because the tool tried to hide all the complexity instead of letting power users extend it. But what I’m seeing now is different—there’s this sweet spot where you can build the entire workflow visually, and then if you need to do something unconventional, you can drop in JavaScript snippets just for those parts.
The real question I’m wrestling with is: how far can you actually push this before you’re better off just writing the whole thing in code? Like, if 80% of your automation is visual but you need custom logic for data transformation or API calls, does adding JavaScript to just those pieces actually save time, or does it just create more maintenance headaches later?
Has anyone here actually tried this hybrid approach? I’m curious whether non-developers on your team can genuinely maintain workflows once you start mixing visual and code layers.