I’ve been experimenting with AI copilot workflow generation for the past few weeks, specifically trying to automate some repetitive form filling on a vendor portal we use. The promise is that you describe what you want in plain English and it generates a ready-to-run workflow.
Here’s what I found: I wrote something like “log into the portal, navigate to the purchase orders section, and fill in the order details from a CSV file.” The system actually generated a workflow that was maybe 70% there. The login part worked fine, but it had trouble with some of the dynamic dropdown menus and the form validation logic.
I ended up having to tweak the workflow manually to handle edge cases—like when the site returns an error message and you need to retry. It wasn’t terrible, but it wasn’t as automated as I’d hoped either.
The real question I have though: does this match everyone else’s experience, or am I just not writing my descriptions well enough? I’m wondering if there’s a sweet spot for the complexity level of tasks where the AI-generated workflows actually work without much modification.