I’ve been wrestling with webkit rendering quirks killing my automated workflows, and I realized the real issue wasn’t the rendering itself—it was that I was trying to handle everything with one agent doing one job.
Last month, I set up Autonomous AI Teams with a QA Agent handling test execution and a WebKit Specialist agent monitoring rendering across Safari and Chromium variants. The QA Agent would run a task, hit a rendering issue, then flag it. The WebKit Specialist would analyze the specific variant and suggest adaptation strategies rather than just failing the whole workflow.
What actually worked was having these agents communicate about what broke and why. When Safari rendered a lazy-loaded element differently than Chromium, instead of the workflow dying, the WebKit Specialist would adjust the waiting logic and the QA Agent would retry with context about what to expect.
I’m curious though—when you’ve got multiple agents running against the same webkit task, how do you actually decide which agent owns the decision when rendering behaves differently across variants? Do you give one agent final say, or do you build consensus somehow?