I came across some news reports claiming that certain executive orders might have been created using AI technology, and people are saying they look rushed or poorly put together. Has anyone else heard about this controversy? I’m trying to understand if there’s any truth to these accusations about artificial intelligence being used to write official government documents. The critics seem to think you can tell when something was written by a machine instead of human staffers. What are your thoughts on whether AI should be used for creating important legal documents like executive orders? Are there ways to spot when text has been generated by artificial intelligence rather than written by actual people?
I work in government communications and AI detection in official docs is becoming a real problem. Dead giveaways? Repetitive phrases, weirdly formal language that sounds fake, and logic gaps any human editor would’ve spotted. Most agencies require human review for all official documents, but enforcement is all over the place. The real issue isn’t just sloppy quality - it’s accountability. When AI writes content, you can’t trace who made what decisions or whether legal properly reviewed it. Executive orders have serious legal weight, so using AI without oversight could create constitutional problems later. The tech isn’t bad by itself, but we need transparency about when government uses it.