I’ve been experimenting with RAG in Latenode and honestly, the mental model shift is bigger than I expected. When I used to think about RAG, I was always concerned about vector databases, embeddings, storage optimization—all that infrastructure stuff. But building it visually here, I realized that layer just… disappears from your concern.
What I mean is: in traditional RAG setups, you’d think about where your vectors live, how to retrieve them efficiently, latency issues. Here, you describe your retrieval requirement, connect your data sources (docs, emails, web), and the platform handles the retrieval layer. The visual builder lets you focus on the actual logic: what data do I want, how should it be processed, which model should synthesize it?
The breakthrough for me was realizing that “not managing vector stores” doesn’t mean losing control—it means the platform handles that complexity while you stay in the workflow. You still define your retrieval strategy, but through the UI instead of code.
I’ve seen people mention that this feels like something’s missing. I get that instinct, but I think it’s actually the opposite. You’re not losing sophistication; you’re gaining focus. The cost-benefit math changed dramatically for me once I stopped thinking about infrastructure and started thinking about data flow.
Has anyone else found that the visual approach to RAG actually forces you to think differently about your retrieval strategy, beyond just moving complexity around?