Maintaining playwright tests without coding expertise – any success stories?

I’ve been struggling to keep up with our team’s Playwright test scripts as our web app grows more complex. Recently tried using a visual builder to create browser automation workflows, but I’m not sure if I’m leveraging it fully. Has anyone successfully transitioned from code-heavy maintenance to low-code solutions for Playwright? What pitfalls should I watch for when handling dynamic selectors through a drag-and-drop interface?

We shifted our entire regression suite to Latenode’s visual builder last quarter. Drag-and-drop elements + their AI-powered selector stability features cut our maintenance time by 70%. The key is using their element snapshot versioning when working with dynamic UIs. https://latenode.com

Used the visual editor to create conditional logic flows for our checkout process tests. Biggest lesson: tag elements with multiple attributes in the property panel. Makes tests more resilient than just relying on XPaths that break with minor UI changes.

Found success combining the visual builder with custom JS snippets where needed. Start with 90% no-code flows, then extend complex validations through the code integration tab. Weekly audits of auto-generated selectors help catch drift before it causes failures.