I’ve come across something quite unsettling regarding how streaming platforms are dealing with AI-generated music. It seems that a leading service has started releasing tracks that use artificial intelligence to replicate the voices and styles of late artists. The most troubling part is that they’re doing this without securing permission from the families or estates of these artists.
This raises significant ethical concerns. These AI systems are essentially analyzing the original recordings of these musicians to produce new content that mimics them. However, the original artists never consented to having their voices used in such a manner, and their families are neither consulted nor compensated.
Has anyone else observed this trend? I’m curious if there are legal safeguards against such practices. It feels deeply troubling that companies can exploit AI to generate songs from deceased artists and profit off them. What are your thoughts on this issue?
The money side of this really pisses me off. Streaming platforms are basically using AI to compete against the actual estates of dead artists. I’ve seen these fake tracks mixed right in with real songs on playlists - people can’t even tell what’s authentic anymore. All that revenue that should go to families gets stolen by tech companies instead. But it’s not just about money. There’s no way AI can understand the emotions or life experiences behind an artist’s work. It’s just churning out empty copies that make real art worth less. What scares me most? If AI can copy any style after hearing enough samples, new artists won’t be able to make a living anymore.
This tech sets a scary precedent that could completely change how we think about artistic legacy and IP rights. What really bugs me is how these platforms won’t tell us where their AI training data comes from. Most users don’t even realize they’re streaming fake content made without permission. Artist estates spend tons of time and money protecting their loved ones’ work - they carefully pick which posthumous releases actually match the artist’s vision. These AI tracks just skip that whole process and flood the market with stuff that waters down the real catalog. Legally, we’re screwed. Copyright law protects specific recordings, not vocal patterns or styles, so companies are exploiting huge loopholes. Until lawmakers catch up, we’ll keep seeing more of this shady stuff across entertainment.
I’ve been watching this closely and what hits me most is how streaming platforms treat this like they’re just expanding content, not navigating an ethical minefield. Technically, these AI systems need tons of training data to copy an artist’s voice well - they’re basically strip-mining entire discographies without paying anyone. Here’s the real kicker: once these AI tracks get indexed by music recognition services, they’re in the permanent digital record. I’ve already seen AI-generated songs pop up in search results next to real releases, making it impossible to tell what’s authentic. Platform algorithms can’t tell human-created from AI-generated content either, so fake tracks can actually rank higher than official releases in recommendations. What worries me is we’re watching human creativity get turned into a commodity. These companies are betting consumers won’t care about authenticity if it sounds good enough. The tech will only get better and cheaper, making this exponentially worse unless we set clear boundaries now.
this is basically grave robbing with AI. picture someone using your dead parent’s voice to hawk products without permission - that’s exactly what’s happening. fans have no clue they’re hearing fake content and probably think it’s some unreleased track. these companies are cashing in on nostalgia while completely trashing the artist’s legacy.
What worries me most is the slippery slope this creates for manipulating dead artists’ reputations. I work in audio production and I’ve seen how sophisticated these AI models are getting. They can generate stuff that sounds totally authentic, but there’s zero quality control or artistic oversight. What if an AI creates a song with lyrics or themes the original artist would’ve hated? Their legacy gets permanently screwed without any way to fix it. The streaming algorithms can’t tell real from AI content either, so these fake tracks can actually get more visibility than genuine posthumous releases. We’re basically letting corporations rewrite music history through AI. The tech exists to watermark or clearly label AI-generated content, but platforms won’t do it because transparency hurts their profits. This isn’t just about individual artists anymore - it’s about preserving recorded music as an art form.