I’m building automations that generate and transform code, and I keep running into the same problem: different AI models have different strengths. Claude is solid for logic, but OpenAI sometimes handles edge cases better. Deepseek is surprisingly good at certain patterns. But testing all of them means managing multiple subscriptions, multiple API keys, and figuring out which one actually works best for my specific use case.
It’s maddening because I spend more time setting up integrations than actually testing the quality of the outputs. By the time I’ve configured everything, I’ve already committed to a model based on assumptions instead of real data.
I know there are platforms that claim to handle model switching, but I haven’t found one that actually makes it frictionless. The setup overhead is almost as much work as just going with my first choice and moving on.
Does anyone here have a workflow where they’re genuinely A/B testing different models on the same tasks without getting buried in infrastructure? What actually works in practice?