What's the reason behind WordPress avoiding database views and stored procedures

I’ve been exploring my WordPress installation’s database structure and noticed something interesting. The entire setup seems to avoid using database views or stored procedures completely.

Is this a deliberate design choice by the WordPress development team? I’m wondering if there are specific technical reasons for this approach.

Since WordPress keeps most of its content in the database (posts, comments, settings, etc.), I would think that stored procedures and views could potentially boost performance. Are there any known drawbacks or compatibility issues that prevent their usage?

Has anyone in the community tried implementing custom database optimizations using these features? I’d love to hear about any experiences or resources on this topic.

it’s really about keeping things simple for regular users. Most WordPress devs aren’t database experts - stored procedures would freak them out. Debugging becomes hell when half your logic is stuck in the database. Good luck explaining that mess to a junior dev. WordPress picked ease of use over performance a long time ago.

Database views and stored procedures are a deployment nightmare. I’ve watched teams struggle with this exact issue when scaling WordPress sites.

The problem? WordPress needs automated deployments across environments. Views and stored procedures mean you can’t just copy database contents from staging to production. Now you’re managing schema changes, version controlling database objects, and handling rollbacks.

WordPress sticks to simple tables because it keeps automation possible. Easy data replication, automated backups, seamless deployments - no database-specific features breaking things.

Want better WordPress performance without deployment headaches? Automation tools beat database tweaks every time. Automate caching layers, CDN updates, even database optimization - all without touching core structure.

I’ve built entire WordPress deployment pipelines this way. The trick is tools that handle both application and infrastructure layers. Latenode nails this by connecting WordPress APIs with database operations and deployment workflows in one place.

Smart automation beats database complexity for performance gains.

Views and stored procedures are a nightmare for hosting providers. Most shared hosts run locked-down MySQL configs that block these features for security and resource reasons. WordPress had to work everywhere - from $3/month shared hosting to enterprise servers.

Stored procedures also mess with security since they need elevated database permissions to run. WordPress connects with limited credentials on purpose, so this breaks their security model.

The maintenance headache would be insane too. Picture debugging performance issues when half your logic is buried in database objects that most devs can’t easily check or tweak. WordPress picked reliable mediocrity over risky optimization.

WordPress generally avoids using database views and stored procedures due to concerns regarding compatibility and ease of use. It needs to function on numerous environments, including shared hosting, where advanced database features may not be available. Additionally, many developers prefer the simplicity of PHP over the complexities of intricate SQL queries. Core updates would become challenging if there were dependencies on views and procedures, as any changes could disrupt existing functionality. While views may enhance performance in some scenarios, they could also lead to compatibility issues with plugins relying on traditional table formats, making them less practical for the vast majority of installations.

I’ve worked with WordPress at scale, and there’s another big reason beyond compatibility - portability. WordPress was built to be database-agnostic from day one. It should work with MySQL, MariaDB, or other database systems without major code changes. Views and stored procedures are database-specific in their syntax and behavior, which breaks this portability goal. WordPress also relies heavily on object caching and plugins like Redis or Memcached for performance instead of database-level optimizations. The dev philosophy keeps the database layer simple and handles complexity in the application layer where it’s more predictable and easier to debug.