I’ve tried AI code generation before, and the pattern is always the same: you describe what you want, the AI spits out something that’s half right but needs tweaking, then you spend more time fixing it than if you’d just written it yourself.
But I keep hearing about workflow generation tools that supposedly let you describe an automation in plain language and get something executable back. I’m curious whether that’s actually improved, or if it’s just the same problem with a prettier UI.
Like, if I say “extract data from this API, transform it to match our schema, and save it to our database,” does the AI understand what I mean well enough to generate a workflow that actually runs? Or do I end up with pseudocode that requires me to understand the platform’s internals to finish it?
I’m skeptical because automation requirements are almost always more specific than they sound. There are edge cases, retry logic, error handling. Either the AI asks a million clarifying questions, or it makes assumptions that break in production.
Has anyone actually used AI workflow generation on something non-trivial and had it work the first time without major fixes?