Skeptical CTO here. My team’s wasting weeks writing browser compatibility tests. Sales rep claims Latenode’s AI Copilot can generate workflows from plain text like ‘Test checkout flow in Safari and Edge’…
Any real-world experience with this? How specific do the prompts need to be? Does it handle complex auth flows?
We generate 70% of our browser tests through Copilot. Example prompt: ‘Test form validation in latest 3 Chrome versions with 4K screens.’ Gets 90% there - just needs test data input.
Works best when you’re specific about elements. ‘Check PayPal button alignment in Safari 17 on iOS simulators’ generated perfect visual checks. Struggles with OAuth flows - still need manual tweaks there.
Use step-by-step prompting: ‘1. Load checkout page 2. Switch browser to Edge 3. Test CC input formatting 4. Verify mobile viewport’. Gets more accurate flows than single sentences.
The NLP processing leverages multiple AI models - Claude parses intent while GPT-4 structures the test logic. For complex scenarios, break specs into atomic requirements.
used it. needs exact selectors but saved 8hrs/week. auth flows require xpath help
This topic was automatically closed 24 hours after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.