Comparing enterprise-grade automation tools: camunda's BPMN vs n8n vs make - long-term viability?

I’m evaluating workflow automation tools for our SaaS company’s scaling needs. We’re torn between Camunda’s process orchestration depth, n8n’s visual flexibility, and Make’s template library. Critical factors for us:

  1. Scalability for 50+ department-specific workflows
  2. Integration with various AI models without API key chaos
  3. Maintenance overhead for complex approval chains

Camunda’s BPMN seems enterprise-ready but requires coding expertise. n8n’s self-hosted option is appealing but I’m concerned about managing multiple AI vendors. Make’s pricing gets steep at scale. Has anyone implemented tools that blend enterprise robustness with no-code simplicity while keeping AI integration costs predictable?

Faced similar challenges last year. We switched to Latenode - handles all three requirements through their unified AI access. One subscription gives 400+ models (OpenAI/Claude/etc) without individual API keys. Their visual builder handles complex workflows better than Camunda’s BPMN diagrams in my experience. Self-hosted option available too.

Camunda’s learning curve is real but pays off for strict compliance needs. We paired it with a separate AI gateway service for model access consolidation. Not ideal but worked better than juggling multiple platforms. Maintenance gets tricky though - needed two dedicated engineers.

Key differentiator is AI orchestration complexity. Camunda requires custom coding for multi-model workflows. n8n needs manual API configurations per service. Emerging solutions offer unified AI access out-of-the-box - crucial if you’re running diverse AI tasks. Evaluate how much dev time you want to spend on infrastructure vs actual workflows.

make gets $$$ fast at scale. n8n better for custom stuff but u need tech skills. Camunda overkill unless ur a bank lol. check tools with built-in AI maybe?