We’ve been on Zapier for years, and the licensing model is straightforward: pay per zap, add more apps as needed. It’s predictable, but it’s also expensive at scale.
We looked at Make a few times, and the operations model is cheaper for certain workflows, but you’re still juggling licensing complexity. Both platforms require you to bolt on separate AI model subscriptions if you want any real AI capability.
What’s interesting is I’ve seen some platform comparisons that include unified AI licensing in the equation—basically, one subscription covers your AI model access plus your automation platform.
So I’m trying to model this: let’s say we have 10 concurrent workflows running regularly, plus sporadic ones. On Zapier right now, we’re paying roughly X per month. Make might be 30% cheaper for operations. But if there’s a platform offering unified AI access that actually changes the base cost structure, where does the math break?
Is anyone running a comparison where unified AI licensing actually tips the scales? And if so, how much lower do the platform costs need to be on base pricing to justify the switch?