How can Deno’s approach eliminate version management when projects rely on different Node, npm, and yarn setups? Clarification on handling diverse environments is desired.
Considering my experience with both Deno and traditional npm setups, I’ve observed that strict version management isn’t entirely eliminated, but rather managed differently. Deno employs a URL-based dependency system, which means you can lock versions directly in your import statements, yet it still requires careful tracking when modules update. I’ve found that though the developer experience is smoother, relying on precise version tags in the URL becomes paramount for production stability. Therefore, while it simplifies some aspects of dependency management, it doesn’t entirely remove the need to be vigilant about version control.