At my old company, managers focused heavily on JIRA numbers for performance reviews. This made our dev teams start gaming the system pretty badly.
Here’s what I saw happening:
- Teams would reclassify obvious bugs as “enhancements” to make bug counts look better
- After tickets were already closed, people would go back and mark them as “critical” or “blocker” to boost their high-priority fix numbers
- Single problems got split into multiple tickets, then most got closed without any actual code changes
- Customer issues got marked as resolved before anyone checked if the fix worked, then new non-customer tickets were created if problems persisted
Looking at the dashboard made everything seem amazing, but it was completely fake. Management loved bragging about closing thousands of tickets per release, but nobody questioned why we had thousands of issues to begin with.
When I brought this up, my manager said this was standard practice and I just didn’t understand enterprise development workflows yet.
Is this actually normal behavior? Do other companies manipulate their tracking tools like this?