I just noticed something interesting. FastAPI, the newer web framework, has caught up to Django in terms of GitHub stars. This is pretty surprising to me. I remember when FastAPI was just starting out and now it’s neck and neck with Django, one of the most popular Python web frameworks.
What do you think this means for the Python web development world? Is FastAPI becoming the go-to choice for new projects? Or is Django still holding strong despite the competition?
I’d love to hear your thoughts on this. Have you used both frameworks? Which one do you prefer and why? Are stars even a good measure of a framework’s popularity or usefulness?
As someone who’s worked with both Django and FastAPI, I can say they each have their strengths. Django’s been around longer and has a more robust ecosystem, which is great for complex projects. FastAPI, on the other hand, is lightning-fast and perfect for API-centric applications.
The star count parity is interesting, but I wouldn’t read too much into it. It’s more a reflection of FastAPI’s rapid rise than Django’s decline. In my experience, many teams still choose Django for its batteries-included approach and mature community.
That said, FastAPI’s growth is impressive. Its async capabilities and automatic API documentation are game-changers for certain types of projects. I’ve found myself reaching for FastAPI more often lately, especially for microservices.
Ultimately, the choice between them depends on the project requirements. Both frameworks have their place in the Python ecosystem, and I don’t see that changing anytime soon.
stars dont mean everything. i’ve used both and fastapi is great for quick apis, but django still rules for big projects. its ecosystem is huge. fastapi’s growth is cool, but django aint going nowhere. in my projects, i pick based on needs. sometimes fastapi, sometimes django. both have their place tbh.
I’ve been using both Django and FastAPI in production for a while now, and I can confidently say that the GitHub star count doesn’t tell the whole story. While FastAPI’s rise is impressive, it’s important to consider the context.
Django remains a powerhouse for full-stack web development. Its ORM, admin interface, and built-in authentication are hard to beat for rapid application development. We’ve built several large-scale projects with Django, and its ecosystem has never let us down.
FastAPI, however, shines in different scenarios. We’ve used it extensively for microservices and API-heavy applications. Its performance and ease of use for these specific use cases are unparalleled. The automatic OpenAPI documentation is a huge time-saver for our team.
In my experience, the choice between Django and FastAPI often comes down to project requirements and team expertise. We’ve found that having both in our toolkit allows us to choose the right tool for each job. The star count parity is interesting, but it’s just one metric among many to consider when evaluating frameworks.