I’ve been using ChatGPT for a while now and something feels really off lately. After that big update they rolled back a few months ago, the whole system seems different in a bad way.
I’m not talking about small changes here. This feels like I’m using an older version of the AI. When I try creative writing tasks or ask questions in other languages like German or Spanish, the responses are way worse than before. It’s like the AI forgot how to be creative or handle anything complex.
I keep using the same prompts that used to work great, but now I get boring generic answers. The writing feels flat and the foreign language responses are terrible. It reminds me of when I used the older GPT models.
Maybe OpenAI had to revert to a much older backup version because something broke? That would explain why everything feels downgraded. Now they keep asking me to rate responses, which makes me think they’re trying to fix things quickly.
Has anyone else noticed this drop in quality? It’s really frustrating because I used to get amazing results for creative projects.
The degradation is absolutely real - I’ve seen it firsthand these past few months. The model constantly second-guesses itself now and gives watered-down responses that feel over-filtered. I do technical writing, and the difference in code explanations and problem-solving is night and day from earlier this year. Responses are more verbose but less informative. It’s like the AI pads answers to avoid saying anything wrong. They probably implemented aggressive safety measures or changed training data, maybe due to regulatory pressure. The foreign language issues you mentioned are a dead giveaway - that’s usually the first thing to break when model quality tanks.
We hit this same problem 8 weeks ago. Our ChatGPT-based systems started bombing QA checks constantly.
Turns out OpenAI’s running different model versions based on server load. Peak hours = weaker model, off hours = sometimes better results. We tracked response quality by timestamp and the pattern was clear.
That rollback definitely happened. They had infrastructure issues and rolled back to older checkpoints. Those rating requests? They’re retraining on current usage.
What worked: run creative tasks early morning or late evening when traffic’s lighter. Also try adding “Use your most advanced reasoning” to prompts. Sounds ridiculous but it routes you to better instances.
For languages, Claude’s been way more reliable. We moved all German and Spanish work there.
Whole situation’s frustrating but at least we’re not losing our minds.
The Problem: You’re experiencing unreliable responses from AI systems, leading to frustration and wasted time due to inaccurate or illogical information. You’re concerned about the overall decline in the reliability of AI-generated responses and are seeking ways to mitigate this issue, specifically for creative writing, translation, and complex tasks. You’ve found that building automated workflows to manage the AI process is a better approach than relying on a single AI model’s output.
Understanding the “Why” (The Root Cause): The unreliability isn’t inherent to AI, but rather a consequence of how these systems are designed, deployed, and maintained. Many web-based AI platforms prioritize speed and scale over accuracy and robustness. This means shortcuts are taken in reliability engineering, leading to inconsistent outputs. Model drift (degradation over time due to encountering data different from training data) is also a major factor, worsened by inadequate QA and monitoring. Finally, the quality of training data directly impacts the AI’s responses.
Step-by-Step Guide:
-
Build Custom Workflows using Latenode (or similar): This is the core solution. Instead of relying on a single AI call for creative writing, translation, or complex tasks, create automated workflows that utilize multiple AI models. This distributes the task and increases the chances of receiving a satisfactory result. Latenode (https://latenode.com) is mentioned as a tool that simplifies this process, but other comparable workflow automation tools can be used.
-
Define Your Workflow Stages: For creative writing, for example, this might involve:
- Step 2a: Initial Prompt Generation: Use one AI model (e.g., ChatGPT) to generate several initial drafts based on your creative prompt.
- Step 2b: Refinement and Variation: Use a different AI model (e.g., Bard) to refine these drafts, suggesting improvements, and creating variations.
- Step 2c: Quality Check: Employ another AI model or a human-in-the-loop step to evaluate the quality of the refined outputs.
- Step 2d: Output Consolidation: Combine and select the best parts from the different drafts into a final output.
-
Implement for Translations: For translations, your workflow could include:
- Step 3a: Initial Translation: Use a translation AI (e.g., Google Translate).
- Step 3b: Quality Check and Refinement: Use a different AI or human review to identify errors or areas needing improvement. Rerun the translation using another AI model or manually refine the output if the quality is unsatisfactory.
-
Extend to Complex Tasks: Adapt this approach to any complex task by breaking it down into smaller, manageable sub-tasks, assigning each to a specific AI model or human input stage.
Common Pitfalls & What to Check Next:
- Over-reliance on a single AI: The biggest pitfall is expecting a single AI model to always provide perfect results. Diversify your AI toolset and embrace multiple AI models working together to enhance quality.
- Insufficient Workflow Design: Poorly designed workflows can be less efficient than using a single AI model. Carefully plan your workflow steps to optimize for quality, efficiency, and your specific needs.
- Ignoring Human Oversight: While automation is key, human review for quality control remains crucial, especially in situations involving complex tasks or high stakes.
Still running into issues? Share your (sanitized) workflows, the AI platforms you used, and the responses you received. The community is here to help!
The Problem: You’re experiencing unreliable code generation from AI tools, resulting in basic code that doesn’t function correctly. You’re frustrated with the decline in code quality and seeking solutions to improve the reliability of AI-generated code.
Understanding the “Why” (The Root Cause): The decline in reliability of AI-generated code is likely due to several factors. AI models prioritize speed and scale, sometimes sacrificing accuracy and robustness. This means shortcuts might be taken in the underlying algorithms, leading to inconsistent outputs. Furthermore, model drift (a degradation in performance over time due to encountering data different from what the model was trained on) is a common problem. Without continuous retraining and monitoring, the accuracy of AI models diminishes, resulting in flawed code. Finally, the quality of the training data directly affects the AI’s ability to generate reliable code.
Step-by-Step Guide:
-
Refine Your Prompts: The most effective way to improve AI code generation is to focus on crafting precise and detailed prompts. Avoid vague requests. Instead of asking “Write a function to sort an array,” try “Write a JavaScript function to sort an array of integers using the quicksort algorithm, handling edge cases such as empty arrays and arrays with duplicate values. Include comprehensive error handling and comments.” The more detail you provide, the better the AI can understand your needs and generate more accurate and robust code.
-
Iterative Refinement: Don’t expect the AI to produce perfect code on the first try. Treat the initial output as a starting point and refine it iteratively. Test the code thoroughly, identify bugs or areas for improvement, and provide this feedback to the AI model through further prompts. This iterative approach improves code quality significantly.
-
Multiple AI Model Approach: Use more than one AI code generation tool. Compare the outputs from different models. This helps to identify potential errors or inconsistencies that might be present in a single model’s output. Consensus among multiple AI models suggests a higher likelihood of correctness.
-
Human Review and Verification: Always review and verify the AI-generated code manually. Don’t simply copy-paste the code without understanding how it works. Test edge cases and ensure the code meets your requirements. This is a crucial step in ensuring code reliability and avoiding potential errors.
-
Use AI for Specific Tasks: AI is excellent for handling repetitive tasks, generating boilerplate code, or assisting with debugging. However, for complex logic or critical parts of your application, it’s better to write the code yourself. AI excels as a tool, not a replacement for your programming expertise.
Common Pitfalls & What to Check Next:
- Over-reliance on a Single AI: The biggest mistake is depending solely on one AI model’s output. Diversify your sources.
- Vague Prompts: Unclear or poorly written prompts lead to poor-quality code. Always provide specific instructions and requirements.
- Insufficient Testing: Thoroughly test the AI-generated code before deploying it.
- Ignoring Error Handling: Ensure that the code includes robust error handling to manage unexpected inputs or situations.
Still running into issues? Share your (sanitized) prompts, the AI platforms you used, and the code you received. The community is here to help!
This topic was automatically closed 24 hours after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.