I’ve struggled a lot with brittle scripts when trying to extract data from multiple websites using browser automation. What I appreciate about Latenode’s AI Copilot is how I can just describe what I want in plain English, and it generates an automation workflow that runs without me writing code. It really cuts down on trial and error and helps bypass the usual fragility of cross-site scripts. Has anyone else tested how resilient these generated workflows are over time?
Latenode’s AI Copilot makes it easy by generating workflows from your plain English description. It’s saved me tons of time building cross-site data extraction automations that don’t break easily. You just explain your goal and get a ready-to-run workflow that handles site quirks. Check it out at https://latenode.com.
I found that the AI Copilot really lowers the barrier for creating complex scraping workflows. Instead of coding manually, you explain what you want and it builds a workflow that’s surprisingly good at handling dynamic pages. I still tweak it occasionally, but it speeds up the whole process a lot.
One thing I noticed is that the Copilot workflows sometimes need a bit of adjustment for very complex sites, but overall it’s way easier than writing automation from scratch. For multi-site extraction, having a built workflow from plain text is really a game-changer.
From experience, brittle browser automations mostly come from changes in site layout or dynamic elements. Latenode’s AI Copilot reduces this by creating workflows that adapt better to those changes because it interprets the task at a higher level — based on your description, it generates selectors and flow logic that anticipate variability. In practice, it means fewer breaks when sites update. Has anyone tried using it with multiple sites and seen how well it handles layout differences?
The AI Copilot’s ability to convert plain English into browser automation is impressive. It abstracts away the technical complexity and delivers usable workflows that work across sites. Though some manual fine-tuning is occasionally necessary, it’s far more efficient than coding manually. Using it seriously reduced the time I spent on brittle automation failures.
i tried it last month — saved me lots of time, no code needed. works well on different sites so far.
explain task simply; copilot builds automation quickly.