Migrating IBM BAW workflows can be slowed down by having to build common process patterns from scratch in Camunda. I’ve tried using ready-to-use templates that map typical IBM BAW BPM constructs to Camunda-style automations. They cut initial setup and testing times noticeably. But do templates truly capture the complexity of real-life variations, or do they just serve as a starting point? What kind of adjustments do you normally need after applying these templates?
Templates that map IBM BAW patterns to Camunda automations cut setup by weeks in my projects. They’re flexible enough to tweak for specific cases, making migration less grunt work.
I’ve used ready-to-use templates to jumpstart migration, then customized them heavily. Templates save time but aren’t a one-size-fits-all.
Templates speed up common paths but edge cases need manual changes. Still better than starting zero every time.
Ready-to-use templates facilitate rapid migration of standard IBM BAW workflow components to Camunda by providing pre-built structures. They reduce repetitive efforts and allow teams to focus on fine-tuning process-specific logic. Yet, comprehensive testing and adaptation remain vital for success.
using templates cuts a lot migration time, but expect some manual tweaks.
This topic was automatically closed 24 hours after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.