How to check Android SDK level through code

[Oscar64]

I’m working on an Android app and need to determine which API level the device is using at runtime. I want to implement different features based on the Android version the user has installed. Some newer features are only available in higher API levels, so it’s essential to check this programmatically before calling certain methods. Is there a built-in way to detect the current SDK version that the phone is running? I’ve noticed that some apps behave differently depending on the Android version, indicating that there must be a way to obtain this information through code. What’s the best approach to retrieve this data in my application?

[WhisperingWind]

Build.VERSION.SDK_INT works fine, but I’ve learned the hard way not to assume API level means a feature actually works. What really saved me was setting up a feature registry pattern early. Don’t scatter version checks everywhere - create an interface for each feature with different implementations for different SDK levels. Register the right one at startup based on Build.VERSION.SDK_INT. Your business logic stays clean and testing gets way easier. You can mock different Android versions by swapping implementations instead of trying to fake Build.VERSION values. One thing that bit me: the compiler still throws deprecation warnings even when you check SDK levels properly. Use @SuppressWarnings(“deprecation”) sparingly and document why you’re using older APIs for backward compatibility. Also, use AndroidX libraries when you can - they handle compatibility checking internally and keep behavior consistent across API levels.

[Bob_Clever]

totally agree, just check Build.VERSION.SDK_INT for the current version. it’s simple to compare with Build.VERSION_CODES for your needs. easy peasy!

[avaw]

I’ve hit this issue tons of times. Build.VERSION.SDK_INT works, but I learned the hard way not to rely on it alone.

Don’t just check SDK level and assume everything works. Had devices report API 23 where permissions failed because of OEM tweaks.

Now I combine SDK checks with actual feature detection. Use PackageManager.hasSystemFeature() for hardware stuff and verify classes exist before using them.

Like with camera2 API - don’t just check SDK >= 21. Also verify the camera manager actually supports what you need.

Also, store your API level in a static variable at startup instead of calling Build.VERSION.SDK_INT everywhere. Better for debugging and performance.

I keep a utility class with methods like isApi21Plus() instead of spreading version codes all over. Way easier when you bump minimum SDK later.

[Tom_Artist]

The Problem: You’re finding that manually checking Android SDK versions using Build.VERSION.SDK_INT for feature compatibility is becoming cumbersome and difficult to maintain as your app grows. You’re looking for a more efficient and manageable way to handle Android API level compatibility.

Understanding the “Why” (The Root Cause):

Scattering Build.VERSION.SDK_INT checks throughout your codebase leads to several issues:

• Code Clutter: Version checks become repetitive and make your code less readable. This is especially true when you need to check the API level before using multiple features.

• Maintenance Nightmare: Adding new features or changing minimum SDK versions requires updating numerous version checks throughout your code, increasing the risk of errors and making maintenance extremely time-consuming.

• Difficult Testing: Testing compatibility with different API levels becomes harder as you have to manage the conditional logic for each version.

• Hidden Bugs: It’s easy to miss edge cases, resulting in unexpected behavior on certain devices or Android versions.

Creating helper methods improves code readability, but it doesn’t solve the core issue of maintaining widespread conditional logic. A more robust solution addresses the underlying problem of managing API-level-dependent features.

Step-by-Step Guide:

1. Create Wrapper Methods (Improved Readability): While not the primary solution, creating concise wrapper methods significantly improves readability. These encapsulate the Build.VERSION.SDK_INT checks.

public class ApiLevelHelper {

    public static boolean isAtLeastMarshmallow() {
        return Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.M;
    }

    public static boolean isAtLeastOreo() {
        return Build.VERSION.SDK_INT >= Build.VERSION_CODES.O;
    }

    // Add more helper methods for other API levels as needed
}

2. Implement a Feature Registry Pattern: This is the core solution to managing API-level-dependent features effectively. Create an interface for each feature and different implementations for various API levels. Then, register the correct implementation at startup based on Build.VERSION.SDK_INT.

// Feature Interface
interface MyFeature {
    void performAction();
}

// API Level 21+ Implementation
class MyFeatureApi21 implements MyFeature {
    @Override
    public void performAction() {
        // Use API 21+ specific code here
    }
}

// API Level <21 Implementation (Fallback)
class MyFeatureFallback implements MyFeature {
    @Override
    public void performAction() {
        // Use fallback code for lower API levels
    }
}

// Feature Registry
class FeatureRegistry {
    private final MyFeature feature;

    public FeatureRegistry() {
        int apiLevel = Build.VERSION.SDK_INT;
        if (apiLevel >= Build.VERSION_CODES.LOLLIPOP) {
            feature = new MyFeatureApi21();
        } else {
            feature = new MyFeatureFallback();
        }
    }

    public MyFeature getFeature() {
        return feature;
    }
}

3. Use the Registry: Now, instead of directly checking API levels in your business logic, use the FeatureRegistry.

FeatureRegistry registry = new FeatureRegistry();
registry.getFeature().performAction();

Common Pitfalls & What to Check Next:

• Thorough Testing: Test your feature implementations across different API levels and devices. Emulators can help simulate various Android versions.

• Manufacturer Variations: Be aware that manufacturers might customize Android, leading to unexpected behavior even with API level checks. Consider adding runtime feature detection using PackageManager.hasSystemFeature() for hardware-specific features.

• Suppression of Deprecation Warnings: Use @SuppressWarnings("deprecation") judiciously and only when necessary. Document why you’re using a deprecated API to maintain code clarity and avoid future issues.

• AndroidX Libraries: Utilize AndroidX libraries whenever possible. They frequently handle backward compatibility, making your life easier.

• Error Handling: Wrap calls to newer APIs in try-catch blocks to handle potential exceptions gracefully.

Still running into issues? Share your (sanitized) config files, the exact command you ran, and any other relevant details. The community is here to help!

[sofia_scribbles]

Manual SDK version checks work, but you’ll hit maintenance hell as your app scales.

I’ve fought this exact issue across tons of Android projects. The real problem isn’t detecting API levels - it’s managing all the conditional logic afterward. Version checks end up everywhere, and debugging compatibility issues becomes a total nightmare.

What fixed this for me? Automating the entire compatibility layer. Don’t hardcode version checks - build an automated system that handles feature detection and fallbacks dynamically.

I use Latenode for automated workflows that manage Android compatibility testing and feature flags. It monitors device capabilities in real time and adjusts app behavior automatically, no manual coding for each API level.

The automation catches edge cases like manufacturer customizations that others mentioned. Plus you get automatic logging showing which devices use which features, so you can make data-driven decisions about dropping older API support.

Saves massive development time vs manually managing Build.VERSION checks everywhere.

Latenode - Create AI Agents & Autonomous Workflows | No-Code &...