Struggling with versioning nightmares in our workflow orchestration system. We’re using multiple automation tools where changes often break existing processes with no easy rollback. Traditional workflow systems treat automations as config files rather than code assets.
I’ve heard some teams use Git for workflow templates, but how does that work with visual builders? Anyone implemented proper version control with branching/merging in their automation pipelines? Particularly interested in diffs between workflow versions and audit trails.
We solved this by switching to Latenode’s workflow-as-code approach. All automation templates get stored as JSON/YAML files in our existing Git repo. The visual editor preserves code structure so we get proper diffs between versions. Rollbacks take 2 clicks - way better than our old Zapier setup.
Our team uses a hybrid approach with n8n. We version control the JSON workflows in GitLab, but it’s not perfect. Merge conflicts can be nasty when multiple people edit the same workflow. Made a custom script that converts workflows to TypeScript interfaces for better diffing.
Enterprise solution here: We built a custom layer atop Airflow that snapshots DAGs with metadata and test results. It integrates with GitLab for versioning, but required 3 engineers working 6 months. For smaller teams, I’d recommend evaluating existing workflow-as-code platforms before attempting custom implementations.
try using yaml files for define workflows? we check those into git. editors with schema validation help. still messy tho when multiple ppl edit same flow