latenode vs n8n - Which is best and Why?

What’s your experience with LateNode? What stood out — for better or worse?

How about n8n? What’s the friction… and the fair points?

What directly impacts your choice? Complexity, ease of use, customization, cost, integrations, stability.

Any use cases where one truly outperforms the other?

Mistakes to avoid when choosing either?

Looking ahead — which has momentum, community support, or future-proofing going for it?

Good morning, I have over 30 scenarios and have used make and n8n for years, and now I’ve been using latenode for months.
n8n and make have more connectors, but latenode’s biggest advantage is having a test and prd environment, each with its own versions.
With make and n8n, if you have a scenario you’re using and need to make changes to, but don’t want it to be used by clients before testing, you can’t. Once saved, it’s available, unless you pay for the enterprise plans to have more than one environment.
Latenode has a save and deploy button, which is great. You can edit, save, and test your changes without impacting client operations. Once tested, just click deploy to make it available to the client.

1 Like