I have noticed a discrepancy in the data I am receiving through the webhook from Latenode. When comparing the information with similar services like Pipedream and Make, I observed that the "invoice_number" field is not included in the webhook data received from Latenode.
This field is important for identifying sales transactions, and it is being received correctly on other platforms.
I would greatly appreciate it if you could review the webhook configuration or any other factor that might be causing this missing "invoice_number" field, to ensure that we receive all the necessary information for our processes.
Please let me know if you need further examples of the received data or if there is anything else I can do to assist.
Thank you in advance for your attention to this matter.
Hi! That sounds a bit odd. Could you send a test webhook to a service like https://webhook.site/ (it allows you to receive test webhook data) and send the same request to Latenode?
Alternatively, show examples from Latenode or any of the platforms mentioned earlier. It’s important for us to understand the format in which the data is received.
Please double-check the settings on the sender’s side, as the data shouldn’t change structure when received through a webhook. If the data didn’t arrive, it means it likely wasn’t sent.
To solve actually im receiving in Make.com webhook, and next a do a http post to send data to Latenode, and you are correct, it receive “invoice_number” but i dont want use anymore Make.com, i want receive webhook direct from sender.
The sender platform is retail.lightspeed (formerly vendhq) POS.
