Understanding observation values in OpenAI Gym environments

I’m trying to figure out what the observation values mean in different OpenAI Gym environments. For instance, in the CartPole-v0 environment, I get outputs like [-0.061586 -0.75893141 0.05793238 1.15547541]. What do these numbers represent?

I’m also curious about how to find this information for other environments such as MountainCar-v0 or MsPacman-v0. Is there a standard way to decode the observation space for any Gym setup?

Here’s a new example that I’m testing out:

import gym_simulator

sim = gym_simulator.create('PoleBalance-v1')
for episode in range(5):
    current_state = sim.start()
    for step in range(50):
        sim.display()
        print(current_state)
        move = sim.random_action()
        current_state, points, finished, extra = sim.take_action(move)
        if finished:
            print(f'Episode ended after {step+1} steps')
            break

Any assistance in decoding these observation values would be highly appreciated!

Hey there! I’ve been playing around with OpenAI Gym environments for a while now, and I’ve learned a thing or two about decoding those observation values. For your PoleBalance-v1, I’m pretty sure it’s giving you info about the pole’s state, like its angle and velocity.

One trick I’ve found super helpful is to print out the observation space at the start of your script. Something like print(sim.observation_space) can give you a good idea of what you’re dealing with. Also, don’t be afraid to dive into the source code of gym_simulator. Sometimes the best way to figure out what’s going on is to look under the hood.

Another thing that’s worked for me is to visualize the environment while printing the observations. It helps you connect what you’re seeing on screen with the numbers you’re getting. Keep experimenting and you’ll get the hang of it!

The observation values in OpenAI Gym environments represent the current state of the environment. For CartPole-v0, those four numbers typically correspond to cart position, cart velocity, pole angle, and pole angular velocity.

To understand observations for other environments, I’d recommend checking the environment’s documentation or source code. Many environments have a detailed description of their observation space in their GitHub repositories or official documentation.

For your PoleBalance-v1 example, it seems similar to CartPole. Without seeing the exact implementation, I’d guess the observation values are also related to the pole’s position and velocity. You might want to look into the gym_simulator package documentation for specifics.

Remember, understanding these values is crucial for designing effective reinforcement learning algorithms, as they form the basis for your agent’s decision-making process.

yo, for different gym envs, the obs values can mean different things. like in cartpole, it’s stuff about the cart and pole positions/speeds. for other envs, you gotta dig into their docs or code to figure it out.

no standard way to decode em all, but usualy the env description tells you what’s what. for your polebalance thing, probly similar to cartpole. good luck figuring it out!

hey emma, i’ve messed with gym envs too. for polebalance-v1, those nums probly show pole angle/speed etc. quick tip: print sim.observation_space to see what ur dealing with. also, try plotting the values while running - helps connect whats happening visually to the numbers. good luck with ur project!

I’ve encountered similar challenges when working with various Gym environments. For PoleBalance-v1, the observation values likely represent the pole’s state variables. To decipher them, I’d suggest printing sim.observation_space at the start of your script. This usually provides insight into the structure and meaning of the observation values.

Additionally, reviewing the gym_simulator documentation or source code can be invaluable. Often, the observation space details are explicitly defined there. If not, you might need to trace the code to understand how the observations are generated.

A practical approach I’ve found useful is to log the observations alongside the visual state of the environment. This helps correlate the numbers with the actual system behavior, making it easier to interpret the data.