I’m currently exploring various methods to run the n8n workflow automation tool on my own servers. One idea under consideration is to use a combination of Render and Supabase, as they are praised for their user-friendly services and effortless scalability. However, I’ve also encountered several opinions advocating for DigitalOcean, which is renowned for its reliable performance and ease of setup. I would appreciate any insights or experiences that could clarify the benefits and potential drawbacks of each option, so I can make an informed choice for my hosting needs.
In my experience managing n8n deployments, using DigitalOcean has often proven to be the more straightforward route in terms of long-term maintenance and system control. While platforms like Render and Supabase offer attractive features such as ease of deployment and scaling, they sometimes lack the flexibility needed when fine-tuning performance and environment configurations. Running n8n on a dedicated droplet allowed for a more hands-on approach, which proved beneficial when optimizing resources and troubleshooting issues. Additionally, the predictability in pricing on DigitalOcean further adds to its appeal for production-level applications.