I’ve recently noticed a strange trend where individuals are outright declining job offers from companies that employ AI chatbots or automated systems for interviews. A friend of mine explained that she turned down three job opportunities simply because they required her to submit video responses to a program rather than engage with an actual person. She mentioned it felt unnatural and impersonal, suggesting the company didn’t value having real human interaction in the hiring process. Are there others out there who feel the same? It appears that many candidates see these automated interview methods as red flags indicating the potential for a toxic or detached workplace culture. I’m interested to know if this response is growing more widespread or if it’s just a few individuals being particular.
This goes way deeper than just preference. I switched careers during the pandemic and hit these systems everywhere - the rejection isn’t about the tech, it’s what it tells you about the company. When they outsource their first impression to a bot, you know that’s how they make decisions across the board. I took a job after one of these automated interviews and my gut was right. Management was totally disconnected, everything ran on systems and metrics, zero human judgment anywhere. The interview was basically a preview of the culture. Now I treat these automated systems like intel on company values. If they won’t invest human time in hiring, they won’t invest it in development, resolving conflicts, or your career growth either. People aren’t being picky - they’re making smart choices about where to spend forty hours a week.
Can’t blame them honestly. Did one of those AI interviews last month - creepy as hell. You’re basically performing for nobody. Mine glitched halfway through and I had to restart everything. If that’s how they handle interviews, imagine what working there is actually like lol
The psychological side gets totally overlooked but it’s massive. Job hunting already makes you vulnerable - you’re putting yourself out there. Then you have to audition for a machine, which kills all the natural back-and-forth that makes interviews tolerable. I did one of these six months ago and couldn’t shake the feeling that algorithms were dissecting my answers for keywords instead of understanding what I actually bring to the table. Felt like being processed, not evaluated. What really bugs me is these systems reward people who perform well on camera over those who actually excel at workplace collaboration. Some of the best coworkers I’ve had would bomb these automated interviews because they shine in real conversations, not talking to a screen with scripted responses. Companies think they’re being efficient but they’re screening out candidates who value genuine communication. In this tight labor market, that’s getting expensive.
Been dealing with this exact issue at my company for the past year. We rolled out an automated screening system and our application completion rate dropped by 40%.
People hate talking to robots when they’re already stressed about finding work. I pushed back on our HR team because we were filtering out really good candidates who just refused to participate.
What really opened my eyes was when a senior developer told me he’d rather stay unemployed than do a one-way video interview. His reasoning was simple - if a company can’t be bothered to have a human conversation during hiring, what does that say about how they treat employees day to day?
We kept the automated system for initial screening but made sure every candidate talks to a real person before any final decisions. Cut down on the rejections significantly.
The job market’s weird right now. People have more leverage than they think and they’re using it to avoid companies that feel impersonal from day one.
This topic was automatically closed 24 hours after the last reply. New replies are no longer allowed.