In light of the superior performance and enhanced security offered by languages like Rust and Zig compared to JavaScript, this question seeks to explore why JavaScript continues to dominate browser-based applications. Despite JavaScript's robust ecosystem and widespread browser support, technical challenges or other constraints might hinder the adoption of Rust or Zig for creating user interfaces. Could the integration complexities, runtime limitations, or compatibility issues be the main factors? Detailed technical insights and analyses are highly encouraged.
i thnk js stays coz it’s ingrained in browsers, and trying rust/zig means extra fiddling with wasm and wrappers that are messy. many devs just pick what works
My experience with front-end development suggests that despite the recognized benefits of Rust and Zig in terms of performance and safety, their adoption in front-end scenarios is impeded by a steep integration curve. JavaScript remains the default due to its native support in browsers and a mature ecosystem that simplifies rapid prototyping. In practice, even when performance gains are observed with WASM, the surrounding tooling and workflows tend to be less polished. As a result, the enhanced security and speed of Rust and Zig are often considered outweighed by the convenience and support JavaScript currently provides.