Hey everyone, I’m a bit confused about the whole AI debate in schools. It seems like there’s an easy fix that teachers are overlooking.
Couldn’t they just use something like Google Docs with version history turned on? That way, they could check how the assignment developed over time. If a student actually wrote it, you’d see gradual changes. But if it’s AI-generated, wouldn’t it show up as one big chunk all at once?
I mean, this would make it pretty obvious if someone’s using AI, right? Is there something I’m missing here? Maybe there are drawbacks to this approach that I haven’t thought of.
What do you all think? Is this a workable solution, or am I oversimplifying the problem? I’d love to hear your thoughts, especially if you’re a teacher or student dealing with this issue.
While version control seems like a logical solution, it overlooks several practical issues. Many students draft offline or use different tools before finalizing their work. This approach also assumes constant internet access, which isn’t universal. Moreover, it raises privacy concerns and adds significant workload for teachers.
The core challenge is adapting education to AI’s rapid evolution. Perhaps we should shift focus to developing critical thinking and application skills that AI can’t easily replicate. This could involve more in-class discussions, project-based learning, and oral presentations. These methods not only discourage AI use but also better prepare students for real-world challenges where information is readily available, but synthesis and application are key.
Ultimately, we need a multifaceted approach that goes beyond simple technological fixes to address the root of the issue.
As someone who’s been teaching for over a decade, I can tell you it’s not that simple. Version control might catch some cases, but it’s far from foolproof. Students could easily game the system by making artificial edits or pasting in chunks over time. Plus, many assignments aren’t done in Google Docs - think math problems, coding projects, or artwork.
There’s also the issue of privacy. Forcing students to work in a constantly monitored environment feels invasive and could stifle creativity. And let’s be real, the workload for teachers to check version histories for every assignment would be insane.
The bigger problem is that AI is evolving faster than our policies. By the time we implement a ‘solution,’ the tech will have already found a workaround. We need to rethink assessment entirely, focusing on in-class work, presentations, and demonstrating understanding rather than just submitted documents. It’s a complex issue without easy fixes.
i think ur onto something, but it’s not perfect. what about kids who don’t have internet at home? they cant use google docs. plus, some students might just copy/paste bits at a time to fake progress. and teachers already got tons of work, checking every doc history would be crazy time-consuming. maybe we need to focus more on in-class work instead?